US Again Considering “Leave it to Bibi” Option on Bombing Iran?

• The charade continues! The western Illuminati is promoting the illusion that there is a severe split between Zionist ‘666’ Israel (the Satanic counterfeit) and America over Iran. It is to build plausible deniability for US when Zionist ‘666’ Israel attacks Iran. The Pentagon does not have the resources to wage 3 major wars: Greater Middle East War, European War and Asia War. The more important wars are against Russia and China. The Pentagram is simply fighting via its proxy: Zionist Israel, in the Middle East. The plan is still Albert Pike’s Satanic WW3!
  –
• US Again Considering “Leave it to Bibi” Option on Bombing Iran? 
  by Robert Barsocchini, http://www.washingtonsblog.com/ 
  While on the surface it may appear that Obama is trying to slow down US aggression towards Iran (the US has already been an accomplice in aggressively killing literally hundreds of thousands of people in Iran), only those who put religious faith in the pronouncements of “their leaders” could say they know for sure that this is indeed what is happening.
  –
  As a review of declassified internal US documents will show, people in and linked to government spend their entire careers figuring out how to do things deceptively.
  –
  What appears to be happening is that Obama is easing off the US aggression throttle towards Iran, while Israel is simultaneously on the precipice of teaming up with Saudi Arabia (another close US client/ally) to aggressively bomb Iran – the top international crime.  See “Saudis Said to Aid Israeli Plan to Bomb Iran“, by Robert Parry.  (Netanyahu is currently being widely exposed as a major liar regarding Iran’s nuclear program, though this was always known to those who follow world affairs by reading broadly, not confining themselves to US/Western mass media propaganda.)
  –
  However, evidence illustrates that we cannot accept this as the only possibility for what is happening. In June, 2009, around the beginning of Obama’s presidency, a US think-tank called Brookings, considered the most influential think tank in the world, published a strategy guide for conquering Iran: “Which Path to Persia? Options for a New American Strategy Toward Iran“.
  –
  One of the chapters is titled “Leave it to Bibi: Allowing or Encouraging an Israeli Military Strike” (Bibi is the nickname for Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.)
  –
  Right away, we see that US strategists thought of this approach at least ~6 years ago: let Israel attack Iran while the US pretends to be a helpless bystander.  So we know Obama has been aware of this “policy option” (of course illegal) for years.
  –
  One way the US, if it actually wanted to, could discourage an Israeli strike against Iran (or any other Israeli crime) would be to tell Israel that if it does not cease its illegal threats of force against Iran (terrorism) or if it actually goes through with them, Israel will be completely cut off from receiving US support, which is already illegal anyway, since Israel is a war-criminal and illegal occupier state (settlements in Palestine, for example, in addition to regular massacres, are legally classed as war crimes).  Israel is the single biggest recipient of US support (meaning in amount of cash and lethal weaponry, but support also includes political – ie UN vetoes, etc. – and promised military backing).
  –
  Here is a brief look at the “Leave it to Bibi” section of the Brookings strategy report:
  –
  The section begins by admitting that “Iran has never been and almost certainly never will be an existential threat to the United States. It harbors no territorial designs on the United States, has never conducted a terrorist operation aimed at the American homeland, and, even should it acquire nuclear weapons, lacks the delivery systems to threaten the United States directly.”
  –
  In listing pros and cons of allowing an Israeli strike on Iran, the report states:
  –
  …the most salient advantage this option has over that of an American air campaign is the possibility that Israel alone would be blamed for the attack. If this proves true, then the United States might not have to deal with Iranian retaliation or the diplomatic backlash that would accompany an American military operation against Iran.
  –
  read more!

[scribd id=108902116 key=key-dda1qzn3fh9wntv55kd mode=scroll]

end