Skip to content
Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics History Blog

  • About

Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics History Blog

Lavrov Brings in Reality: The Issue is Nuclear War!

September 29, 2012 by mosesman
World War 3 is near?
  • Lavrov Brings in Reality — The Issue is Nuclear War! 
    by http://larouchepac.com/ 
    In an interview on the Charlie Rose show Sept. 25, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov responded to Rose’s sometimes rude, and insistent attacks on Russian policy on Syria, with a virtual lesson on international law. Then, at the conclusion, he stunned Rose by raising the real issue which looms behind the Imperial regime-change policy being pursued by the British and the Obama administration: the danger of nuclear war.
    –
    The matter came up when Rose asked about the fate of the Arab spring, and whether Russia feared it. Lavrov responded, “Well, I think they’re now in the Arab Autumn.” Where do you think it’s going, asked Rose. “Well, I hope it’s not going to the nuclear winter,” replied Lavrov.
    –
    When Rose responded, Lavrov said, of course, that was only a figure of speech. Rose, clearly shocked, could only respond, “nuclear winter — devastation of a nuclear attack.”
    –
    The message was obviously delivered, as to what is actually going on with Western policy on the Middle East cockpit, as a whole. Just as General Makarov, and Prime Minister Medvedev, have said before him, Lavrov let it be known that the stakes in the current geopolitical game, are the ultimate ones: thermonuclear extinction.
    –
    The first part of the discussion centered primarily around Syria. Lavrov emphasized Russia’s ongoing commitment to the Geneva agreement of June 30, in which the parties were to work out their differences through dialogue, despite the decision by the opposition and the Security Council not to endorse that agreement. What the international community must do, and what Russia supports, is the cessation of the bloodshed. “The number one priority is to save human lives,” but others instead seek regime change.
    –
    As the discussion moved to previous precedents for such action — such as Libya — the insouciant Rose commented that he understood Russia to have been “offended” by the removal of Qaddafi. “Offend” is not the right word, said Lavrov. The right word is “cheat,” and that’s what was done in the Libyan case on the question of the no-fly zone, and on the arms embargo resolution.
    –
    Rose kept pressing on Russian “support” for Assad, which Lavrov denied. He has done too little, too late, Lavrov said. But “we cannot pretend that he is fighting every day unarmed people.” At the same time the armed opposition, which he said began in May of 2011, was being told by others to “keep fighting to the end.” It was Lavrov who mentioned that there are war crimes being committed in Syria, but on both sides. The issue cannot be to decide who should run the government, but to stop the violence, and ensure that all minorities are respected.
    –
    Later on, as Rose kept claiming that Russia’s support is what is keeping Assad in power, Lavrov encapsulated the Russian government’s position, as follows: “We say we’re not going to endorse a Security Council resolution, which is demanding a unilateral capitulation? Yes. We cannot let this resolution pass, because this is absolutely unrealistic and this would only invite outside intervention.” Rose responded, what if the regime is so morally offensive it has to be changed? Lavrov said that he can’t visualize such a situation.
    –
    He elaborated: “There is one very straightforward example. There were several terrorist attacks against the Syrian government. No only against the security headquarters but also against absolutely civilian sites, social infrastructure, health infrastructure.” A couple of times the Security Council condemned the attacks, but “as of a few months ago, our colleagues, including the United States, started refusing to condemn terrorist attacks against the Syrian government… The reason given to us was that, exactly what you said. The regime is absolutely inhuman, and basically anything goes. This is a very scary position to justify terrorist attacks by anything. That was never acceptable to the Untied States… I believe this is a very slippery slope…”
    –
    Lavrov then drew the conclusion, as have Putin and Medvedev before him: This is a question of the United Nations Charter and international law. That also includes the right to veto, which, in fact, the United States had insisted upon at the founding of the United Nations.
    –
    When the discussion turned to Iran, Lavrov reiterated Russia’s position of opposing trying to bludgeon Iran into compliance, as that is counterproductive. On assessment, he said Russia agreed with the U.S. “There is no political decision [to build a bomb-ed.] in Iran. So if people believe the more you provoke Iran, the sooner Iran would take this decision, then I think that this is a very dangerous path.” He also stressed the need to involve Iran on solving the Syria crisis, endorsing the Morsi proposal for a quartet of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Iran.

end

Post navigation

Previous Post:

Gregory Mannarino: Alert ! Petrodollar Threat, On The Edge Of Global War!

Next Post:

G. Edward Griffin on Quick Fixes, the Looming Great War and Loss of Elite Moral Authority!

One comment

  1. 7ovevol says:
    September 30, 2012 at 12:03 am

    Reblogged this on Convoluted Volatility – StatArb,VolArb; Macro..

Comments are closed.

Pages

  • About

Recent Posts

  • Clayton Morris: Why Is Our Power Grid Under Attack?
  • ‘We Have Something to Answer With’: Putin’s Chilling Nuclear Threat to West Over Ukraine Tanks?
  • Gold, Silver And the Big Economic Reset with Maneco64, Lynette Zang, And Ed Steer
  • Michael Khoury: A Cyber False Flag Attack Is Imminent!!
  • MSNBC Anchor Hospitalized With Severe Myocarditis, Pericarditis
  • COVID Propaganda Collapsing as Myocarditis Cases Rise
  • Is Orchestrated Cyber Attack Coming?
  • Situation Update, Feb 2, 2023: An Online AI System CLONED My Voice! (And Can Clone Yours Too…)
  • MORE Fibrous Clots Being Pulled From Vwaxced DEAD As Embalmers Sound Alarm
  • CrossTalk: Ex-Freemason SPEAKS Out About Satanic Agenda to Deceive Christians
  • Chinese Military Announces YJ-21 Mach 10 Missile Abilities in Social Media Post Read as Warning to US Amid Tension in Taiwan Strait
  • Pfizer CEO Made ‘Misleading’ Statements on Vaccinating Children Against COVID-19: UK Watchdog
  • Warning Issued for Petrodollar
  • WARNINGS Chemical Attack TRUTH is Coming Out in Syria, the Deep State is Mad | Redacted News
  • Middle East Escalation: What Next After Iran Blames Israel for Drone Strike? • FRANCE 24 English
  • Financial Repression Will Dispossess the Masses
  • Why the End of the Petrodollar Spells Trouble for the US Regime
  • Latin America’s New ‘Sur’ Currency Bloc: Regional Integration vs. the Weaponized Dollar
  • Top Thai Authorities Including Advisors to the King in Discussions with Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi Are Prepared to Declare Pfizer Contracts Null And Void!! Royal Family Alerted: Princess is Most Likely a Victim of the Jab!!
  • Recent Data Shows ‘Stunning Increase’ in Serious Harm Reports in Young Healthy Pilots: Army Lt. Col. Theresa Long

Archives

  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011

Categories

  • Disaster
  • Economics
  • Endtimes
  • Geo-Politics
  • History
  • Medicine & Health
  • Satire
  • Science & Technology
  • Social Trends
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
September 2012
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
© 2023 Socio-Economics History Blog | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes