Cardiologist Asks: Why Is COVID Jab ‘Not Being Pulled’ After Showing Adverse Reaction Rate of 1 in 800?
Unprecedented Rates of Adverse Events: We Need to Pull These Shots off the Market
Swine Flu Vaccine (1976) – Pulled after showing a 1 in 100,000 risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome.
Rotavirus Vaccine (1999) – Pulled after showing a 1 in 10,000 risk of bowel obstruction.
COVID Jab… https://t.co/WyU8uK96qC pic.twitter.com/AyqaCp03gC
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) February 19, 2023
- Cardiologist Asks: Why Is COVID Jab ‘Not Being Pulled’ After Showing Adverse Reaction Rate of 1 in 800?
by https://www.infowars.com/
* Swine flu vaccine pulled from market in 1976 after showing 1 in 100,000 risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome.
* Rotavirus Vaccine was pulled in 1999 after showing a 1 in 10,000 risk of bowel obstruction.
–
The COVID jabs, which have an adverse reaction rate of approximately 1 in 800, are still on the market despite previous vaccines with much lower rates of health issues being halted, noted UK cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra.
–
In a resurfaced clip from October 2022 circulating on social media, Malhotra joined GB News to pose the question: why is the COVID jab still on the market despite having a much higher rate of adverse reactions than previous vaccines?
–
“We need to ask people like [England Chief Medical Officer] Chris Whitty and the MHRA [Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency] why when we’ve got a serious adverse event rate, which is probably in the range of at least 1 in 800 to 1 in 1,000, why is it not being pulled?” he asked.
–
“Swine flu vaccine in 1976 was pulled because it caused Guillain-Barré syndrome in 1 in 100,000,” he continued. “Rotavirus vaccine was pulled in 1999 because it caused a form of bowel obstruction in 1 in 10,000.” “We’re talking about serious adverse events of 1 in 800,” he added.
–
Malhotra has since appeared on Fox News to call for pharmaceutical companies that manufactured the experimental COVID shot to compensate patients who’ve suffered injuries from the jab. “We’re dealing with one of the poorest efficacious pharmacological interventions with the worst safety profile which has become the most profitable in the history of medicine,” Dr. Malhotra said.
–
read more.
BREAKING:
Pfizer should compensate the vaccine injured says Cardiologist
‘The fines should be so large that pharmaceutical companies risk going bankrupt and senior executives should go to jail if they knew their medical intervention was going to cause harm’ pic.twitter.com/pTurhqtDhO
— Dr Aseem Malhotra (@DrAseemMalhotra) January 21, 2023
end