Skip to content
Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics History Blog

  • About

Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics History Blog

The Korean Crisis: Washington’s Hidden Agenda!

April 13, 2013 by mosesman

Korea_Peninsula

  • North Korea’s nuclear technology was supplied by former Secretary of Defence: Donald Rumsfeld. Quite obviously with the tacit agreement of Washington. North Korea, IMO, is a controlled opposition of the western Illuminati. The Illuminists are simply employing their strategy of tension to control South Korea and Japan. That has been the main objective for the last 60 years. The fear is that this strategy has changed and an even worse outcome is planned. Ie. War with China using North Korea as the hook/bait. The main threat to the western hegemony is China not North Korea! Any war with North Korea will probably last only 2 weeks once tactical nuclear warheads are employed !
    –
  • The Korean Crisis: Washington’s Hidden Agenda! 
    by Alexander Vorontsov, Strategic Culture Foundation, http://www.globalresearch.ca/ 
    Tensions are rising on the Korean Peninsula. Pyongyang has decided to close the industrial complex in Kaesong, which is a joint enterprise zone with South Korea, and has suggested that foreign embassies evacuate the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea for reasons of safety. Most significant in this series of steps has been the decision of the Plenum of the Central Committee of the Korean Workers’ Party, held in March 2013, regarding legal confirmation of North Korea’s nuclear status and the decision of the Supreme People’s Assembly of North Korea «On further strengthening the status of a country in possession of nuclear weapons for the purposes of self-defence».
    –
    The majority of media, while painting a vivid picture of North Korea’s militancy, is not trying to understand the reasons why the conflict on Korean soil is currently escalating so dramatically. When they do try, they usually name Pyongyang as the instigator of all the troubles, stressing that it was North Korea’s third nuclear test that triggered the «nightmare».

    –
    Consequently, a pressing need has arisen to examine the real, underlying causes of what is commonly referred to as «the Korean problem».
    –
    In short, the initial cause is the unresolved outcome of the Korean War (1950-1953). This year marks 60 years since the end of the war and a peace agreement between its participants has still not been signed Only one Armistice Agreement exists (possibly on paper only these days), so a temporary cessation of hostilities, in other words. More importantly, there are no diplomatic relations between the main warring parties, the USA and North Korea.
    –
    The anomalous nature of a situation like this is obvious. Pyongyang has repeatedly suggested that this astonishing anachronism of the cold war be removed, but in vain: Washington stubbornly refuses to both normalise intergovernmental relations and replace the Armistice Agreement with a fundamental document that establishes lasting peace on the peninsula. Effectively, the US is proving that they have «hostile intentions» – as they are called in Pyongyang – not in words, but in deeds. A peaceful co-existence with the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea does not figure in America’s plans. Rather, they are looking to eliminate the state.
    –
    This is why there is a predetermined state of permanent conflict on the Korean Peninsula, a cyclical development of the situation from acute crisis to relative «remission» and back again. The actions of the West with regard to North Korea result in a vicious catch-22. Calls to stop the nuclear programme, thereby stopping the violation of the principles of the non-proliferation regime of weapons of mass destruction, are often used to cover up the realisation of a hidden agenda – regime change in North Korea…
    –
    As a result, in instances where Pyongyang chooses the bargaining model of relations with the international community and is prepared to agree to mutual compromises with regard to its concerns (the non-proliferation dossier), the West does not see this as an independent decision by those in the north, but as a display of weakness, a triumph of its policy of pressure. Following such logic, Washington and its allies are not in a hurry to assess steps taken by Pyongyang according to their merit, using them in the interests of constructive cooperation and a way to advance the settlement of the Korean Peninsula’s nuclear issue; rather they act the complete opposite. Based on the false understanding that North Korea began to make concessions under external pressure, the West considers it necessary to increase this pressure in order to put the final squeeze on its opponent. And now every time the policy with a false bottom fails. Convinced of the true intentions of its partners, Pyongyang, with a view to cooperating with them, but in no way capitulating, is stopping playing other people’s games and is taking steps to strengthen its national defence capabilities. As a result, instead of the further concessions that were expected and the long-awaited collapse of North Korea, the West is being responded to with new missile and nuclear tests.
    –
    read more!
http://www.democracynow.org/2003/5/2/did_donald_rumsfeld_aid_north_koreas
America supplied North Korea the nuclear technology! Click on image for article!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/may/09/nuclear.northkorea
Click on image to goto article!

end

Post navigation

Previous Post:

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts: FedRes Orchestrated Smash In Gold to Save The Dollar!

Next Post:

Nuclear North Korea Armed Thanks to Bill Clinton!

Pages

  • About

Recent Posts

  • Coordinated Big Media / Big Tech Effort to MEMORY HOLE the Project Veritas “Pfizer Pharma Confessions” Video
  • Senior Pfizer Employee Says Company Exploring Mutating COVID-19 to ‘Preemptively Develop New Vaccines’
  • Aliens Created Humans is the Biggest Lie in the Universe – Steve Quayle
  • NATO State ‘Modeling Cyber Strikes’ on Russian Infrastructure – Moscow
  • Russia Makes Pitch for Common BRICS Currency to Counter U.S. Dollar
  • If WWIII Breaks Out, It Won’t Start on Tanks Or Fighter Jets, Warns Medvedev
  • It’s Happening, Get Ready for Economic Pain & Global Monetary Reset
  • Thai Rice Prices Jump As Global Food Crisis Reignites
  • WEF Announces in New Report that a Catastrophic Mutating Cyber Event Will Strike the World in 2 Years || GLOBAL Cyber Attack ‘Likely This Year’ (Says WEF)
  • Why WAR With Russia Will Spell the END of NATO
  • Douglas Macgregor: Russia Mobilize 700,000 Troops for a New Offensive
  • Metal Stockpile Shortage in LME Could Spill Over to Silver. Interview with Wall Street Silver.
  • Money Managers About To Rush Into Gold/Silver | Michael Oliver
  • Russell Brand And Kim Iversen Cover Bombshell #DirectedEvolution Story Exposing Pfizer
  • New Zealand Study: Pfizer’s mRNA Vaccine Statistically Significant Link to Myocarditis
  • 95 Percent Effective: A FAILURE of the Medical Profession
  • Loud Blast as Drone Attacks Iranian Defence Factory
  • Putin Just Pulled Off the ULTIMATE Sneak Attack Against the West | Redacted with Clayton Morris
  • A “Not So Smart” NATO Admiral Says NATO is Ready for a Direct Military Confrontation With Russia.
  • Debt Bubble About to Pop? What’s Next For Silver & Gold!

Archives

  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011

Categories

  • Disaster
  • Economics
  • Endtimes
  • Geo-Politics
  • History
  • Medicine & Health
  • Satire
  • Science & Technology
  • Social Trends
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
April 2013
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
© 2023 Socio-Economics History Blog | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes