SCIENCE FAIL: Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests Are Unreliable, Unlawful “Evidence” of Alleged Covid-19 Infections
- SCIENCE FAIL: Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests Are Unreliable, Unlawful “Evidence” of Alleged Covid-19 Infections
by Ethan Huff, https://www.naturalnews.com/Index.html
(Natural News) Quarantining people based solely on a “positive” PCR test is no longer lawful in Portugal, thanks to a court decision ruling the test to be inherently unreliable, and thus fraudulent for policy-making purposes.
–
Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court determined that the PCR test produces varying results depending on an individual’s viral load, as well as on the number of cycles used. In its conclusion, the court wrote that:
–
“… if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the U.S.), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”
–
In other words, people who get tested with a PCR test will more than likely receive an inaccurate result, usually a false positive. This would suggest that the official Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) numbers are majorly skewed, making the plandemic seem worse than it actually is.
–
Amazingly, nobody seems to know which cycle threshold for the PCR test was being used in Portugal up until this point. Consequently, there is no way to know how many people who tested “positive” actually had the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19).
–
In India where the standard cycle threshold is between 37 and 40, the reliability of the PCR test there is similarly less than three percent, with a false positive rate as high as 97 percent. You will find more of the latest news about the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) at Pandemic.news.
–
read more.
end