One World Government: Renouncing National Sovereignty is the Only Way to Prevent Nuclear War

• The Illuminist plan as highlighted in the 1950 article by Vincent Sheean. The Synagogue of Satan wants to trigger a thermonuclear WW3 and thereafter introduce their Man of Sin, ‘Savior of the World’. It will not be a full blown WW3 but a limited nuclear war lasting just a few weeks will do. They need to sell sufficient fear to get the sheeple to accept their One World Government led by the Anti-Christ. They intend to execute their Satanic Hoax of 2 Thess 2:9-12, an Alien Invasion to save the world from the nuclear WW3 Armageddon.
  –
• One World Government: Renouncing National Sovereignty is the Only Way to Prevent Nuclear War
  by Matt Novak, http://www.smithsonianmag.com/, APRIL 11, 2013
  One World Government and the War of Tomorrow
  In 1950, journalist Vincent Sheean argued that renouncing national sovereignty was the only way to prevent nuclear war.

• A bright rainbow hangs in the sky, descending just over the horizon. The many people of Earth march slowly toward it, leaving behind the crumbling fist of war, oppression and international borders. Nothing less than the future is over that horizon; a future that is defined by a new world order where people are able to attain true happiness and leave behind the bleak conflicts of the early 20th century.
  –
  At least that’s how it was imagined by illustrator Fred Siebel and writer Vincent Sheean in the January, 1950 issue of Redbook magazine.
  –
  We may not have the one world government envisioned by Vincent Sheean, but we do have a version of the one-superpower world that he predicted would emerge. His vision left open many possible avenues by which this new world order might be achieved — many that left the United States, the Soviet Union or both in ruins. But however that cold conflict came to an end it would bring the dawning of a new age. Sheean, writing in 1950:
  –
  Whatever shape your world may take in the year 2000 A.D., we can all be fairly sure that it will be one world. Whether through war or through peace, the nations fifty years from now will have learned to enmesh their sovereignties into a single supreme authority. They will have learned to do so because, difficult as it may seem now, no other alternative exists. One world or none at all is the choice.
  –
  If we examine the hateful and (to my mind) improbable possibility of war—atomic war between the great powers—we see that one or the other side must be destroyed. The A-bomb, the guided missile, bacteria weapons, make limited wars for limited objectives impossible between great powers. These powers are too powerful, and they have weapons, which once used, would lead into a completely unknowable future. If, however, anything survived, it is certain that one power alone (either the United States or the Soviet Union) would impose its version of world order upon the ruins. That single-power world is profoundly undesirable, because civilization will have been sacrificed to attain it. Barring war then, or a great depression, we can see that the next fifty years offer a tremendous prospect— and challenge. It is a fact that by increasing our production by only a tenth above normal expectations, the U.S. can provide enough to bring every American up to minimum living standards.
  –
  But Sheean held out hope that there was indeed reason to be optimistic about the year 2000. Tremendous scientific advancement and wondrous new tech like supersonic planes and a system of advanced highways (the Federal Highway Act of 1956 was still six years away) would allow humanity to achieve its full potential:
  –
  read more.

end