Why This Gigantic 'Intelligence' Apparatus?

• The NSA is an Illuminist intelligence agency. It does not serve American’s (the public’s) interest! You would think that these ‘American’ intelligence agencies are incompetent and stupid, the way they spent or mis-spent money. I don’t think so! Look beyond the deliberate incompetence, corruption …. It is about camouflaging, disguising their true intentions and objectives! This is really the implementation of the Satanic Beast ‘666’ Global Network!
  –
• Why This Gigantic ‘Intelligence’ Apparatus? 
  by Robert Higgs, Mises.org
  From the Beacon blog of the Independent Institute (2010).
  –
  On July 19, 2010, the Washington Post published the first of three large reports by Dana Priest and William M. Arkin on the dimensions of the gigantic US apparatus of “intelligence” activities being undertaken to combat terrorist acts against the United States, such as the 9/11 attacks. To say that this activity amounts to mobilizing every police officer in the country to stop street fights in Camden only begins to suggest its almost-unbelievable disproportion to the alleged threat.
  –
  Among Priest and Arkin’s findings from a two-year study are the following:
  –
  The top-secret world the government created in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, has become so large, so unwieldy and so secretive that no one knows how much money it costs, how many people it employs, how many programs exist within it or exactly how many agencies do the same work.
  –
  [We] discovered what amounts to an alternative geography of the United States, a Top Secret America hidden from public view and lacking in thorough oversight. After nine years of unprecedented spending and growth, the result is that the system put in place to keep the United States safe is so massive that its effectiveness is impossible to determine.
  –
  Some 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies work on programs related to counterterrorism, homeland security and intelligence in about 10,000 locations across the United States.
  –
  An estimated 854,000 people, nearly 1.5 times as many people as live in Washington, D.C., hold top-secret security clearances.
  –
  In Washington and the surrounding area, 33 building complexes for top-secret intelligence work are under construction or have been built since September 2001. Together they occupy the equivalent of almost three Pentagons or 22 U.S. Capitol buildings – about 17 million square feet of space.
  –
  Many security and intelligence agencies do the same work, creating redundancy and waste. For example, 51 federal organizations and military commands, operating in 15 U.S. cities, track the flow of money to and from terrorist networks.
  –
  Analysts who make sense of documents and conversations obtained by foreign and domestic spying share their judgment by publishing 50,000 intelligence reports each year – a volume so large that many are routinely ignored.
  –
  According to retired admiral Dennis C. Blair, formerly the director of national intelligence, after 9/11 “the attitude was, if it’s worth doing, it’s probably worth overdoing.” I submit that this explanation does not cut to the heart of the matter. As it stands, it suggests a sort of mindless desire to pile mountains of money, technology, and personnel on top of an already-enormous mountain of money, technology, and personnel for no reason other than the vague notion that more must be better. In my view, national politics does not work in that way.
  –
  As Priest and Arkin report, “The U.S. intelligence budget is vast, publicly announced last year as $75 billion, 2½ times the size it was on September 10, 2001. But the figure doesn’t include many military activities or domestic counterterrorism programs.”
  –
  Virtually everyone the reporters consulted told them in effect that “the Bush administration and Congress gave agencies more money than they were capable of responsibly spending.” To be sure, they received more than they could spend responsibly, but not more than they were eager to spend irresponsibly. After all, it’s not as if they were spending their own money.
  –
  read more!

end