Skip to content
Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics History Blog

  • About

Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics History Blog

GotGoldReport: U.S. Banks Buy Gold Futures in Dramatic Position Change!

May 15, 2013 by mosesman

Large_US_Bank_Comex_Gold_Net_Positions_Sept2006-May2013

  • U.S. Banks Buy Gold Futures in Dramatic Position Change! 
    by http://www.gotgoldreport.com/ 
    HOUSTON – We thought we would share with our readership an important change in the positioning of large U.S. banks in the monthly futures-only Bank Participation Report (BPR) issued by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).  The most recent report was published Friday, May 10 for positions as of the close on Tuesday, May 7.
    –
    The main reason we are going to the trouble of doing this short report is that there is a surprising dearth of accurate information about the new data available on the Web.
    –
    One of our members forwarded to us some coverage by others which we found utterly useless and inaccurate (showing a preconceived bias on the part of the author), so perhaps this report will provide some clarity for those who closely follow the CFTC commitments of traders reports as well as the positioning of banks in futures.
    –
    U.S. Banks Net Shorts Fall to Lowest Since Summer, 2008
    Let’s start this review with our comments shared with GGR Subscribers on Sunday, May 12.  After mentioning that the combined commercial traders – the Big Hedgers, which includes the U.S. banks in the Legacy COT reports – had reduced their collective net short positioning for gold to the lowest since the 2008 panic and at a “very fast pace,” we said:
    –
    “An aggressive pace of LCNS reduction with none more aggressive than U.S. banks.  The Bank Participation Report  (not to be confused with the weekly Legacy COT report, which is separate) shows that over the past month U.S. banks covered or offset a whopping 24,855 (60%) of their net shorts (from 41,666 to just 16,781 contracts net short).  The number of U.S. banks reporting falls below 4, a tell.  We have not seen the U.S. banks show so low a net short position since they briefly went slightly net long in the summer of 2008 during the panic.”
    –
    So in just one month, as gold fell a net $123.45 or 7.8% (from $1,575.67 on April 2 to $1,452.22 May 7), U.S. banks covered or offset 60% of their net short bets on gold, down to an extremely small 16,781 contracts net short.  We have to go all the way back to the June 3, 2008 BPR to find a time when the U.S. banks, including bullion banks, showed a lower number of net short bets held.
    –
    In fact, in that June 2008 report the U.S. banks were actually net long gold then by 5,381 lots.  (But as the graph below clearly shows they would not stay net long. By the next monthly report in July they had put on an amazing 82,228 contracts net short in just one month.)
    –
    Below is a graph showing the nominal net short positioning reported by U.S. banks to show it visually. (top of post)
    –
    read more!

end

Post navigation

Previous Post:

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth: Blueprint for Truth. Controlled Demolition! The Official US Government Account is Scientifically Impossible!

Next Post:

Indisputable Proof Paper Gold Markets are Massively Manipulated !

Pages

  • About

Recent Posts

  • Banks Admit The COLLAPSE Is Coming And They Don’t Want YOU to Know About It | Redacted News
  • Musk Doubts Public Awareness of WWIII Risk
  • Germany’s First Leopard Arrives in Ukraine; Europe Angers Putin With 178 Old-Gen Tanks Vow
  • CBDC | CBDCs Explained: The Connection Between 5G, CBDCs, CERN, Quantum
  • The Dangers of EMP and Cyber Attacks Causing Blackouts
  • WEF Predicted CYBER STORM Comes To Italy! Cyber Warfare Spreading Worldwide To Usher In New Crisis
  • SHOCKING Poll: 7 Out Of 10 Embalmers Find HUGE Fibrous Clots In The Dead
  • Pfizer Sponsors Satanic DEATH Ritual honoring Vax Deaths at Grammys?! Clay Clark Joins to Discuss
  • WEF Vows to BAN ‘Dangerous’ Eggs After Study Finds They Cure COVID Naturally
  • The 2023 Grammys Call On Satan During Performance Of ‘Unholy’ Then Immediately Cut To A ‘Brought To You By Pfizer’ Promo, Awake Yet?
  • Cyber Apocalypse 2023: Is The World Heading For A ‘Catastrophic’ Event? || Over 100 MILLION Lose Internet WORLDWIDE – USA, France, Canada, Italy
  • Disease Expert Professor Fukushima Sues Japanese Government For Covering Up COVID Vaccine Dangers
  • Israeli Ex-PM Confirmed: America Blocked Peace/Ceasefire Agreement Between Russia & Ukraine || ‘Peace Had No Chance’ in Ukraine
  • US ‘Neo-Imperialist’ Dollar Scheme Explained by Economist Yanis Varoufakis
  • Radiologist: Cancer Rates SKYROCKETING Among the Vwacxed
  • Former Israeli Prime Minister: US Blocked Peace/Ceasefire Agreement Between Russia & Ukraine 9 Days into Invasion
  • NO ONE Is Ready for What’s Coming In 2023 And The Banks Are In DEEP SH*T | Redacted News
  • CBDCs Are a Desperate Attempt by Central Bankers to Hold on to Power
  • Russia: Ukraine Using Chemical Weapons in Latest Attacks in Donetsk | Redacted with Clayton Morris
  • “This Is the End of this Current Fiat Money Experiment”. Lynette Zang.

Archives

  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011

Categories

  • Disaster
  • Economics
  • Endtimes
  • Geo-Politics
  • History
  • Medicine & Health
  • Satire
  • Science & Technology
  • Social Trends
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
© 2023 Socio-Economics History Blog | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes