Skip to content
Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics History Blog

  • About

Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics History Blog

9/11: How Did They Know? Examining the Foreknowledge of WTC Building 7’s Destruction!

December 6, 2012 by mosesman

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kciuTHmg_rc]
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltP2t9nq9fI]

  • How Did They Know? Examining the Foreknowledge of Building 7’s Destruction! 
    by Dennis McMahon, J.D., L.L.M., http://ae911truth.org/ 
    WTC Building 7, also known as the Salomon Brothers Building or WTC 7, was a 47–story skyscraper that was part of the World Trade Center complex. Built in 1984, Building 7 would have been the tallest high-–rise in thirty–three of our United States. Building 7 housed several intelligence and law enforcement agencies, and the NYC Office of Emergency Management’s Emergency Operations Center, more commonly known as “Giuliani’s Bunker,” along with several major financial institutions.
    –
    Building 7, which was 100 yards from the Twin Towers, was not hit by an airplane on September 11, 2001, and suffered only minimal damage from debris falling from the North Tower. Several fires began burning on a few floors, and the entire building completely collapsed – almost into its own footprint – at 5:20 p.m. Numerous eyewitnesses, including members of the Fire Department of New York (FDNY) and other first responders, and multiple news sources, made statements that indicate that there was foreknowledge that WTC 7 was going to come down, despite the fact that no skyscraper in history had ever completely collapsed due to fire. (Much of this evidence of foreknowledge is detailed on the website of the Remember Building 7 campaign and other related sites.)
    –
    Where foreknowledge of an extremely unusual event is demonstrated, the possibility must be considered that the foreknowledge derived directly or indirectly from those who had inside information about, and/or control over, the event itself. Thus, if foreknowledge of the collapse of Building 7 can be shown, this would be a strong indication that Building 7 was subjected to controlled demolition, and that advance warning of Building 7’s demise derived ultimately from those who intended to bring the building down. Thus, foreknowledge of the collapse of Building 7 is not only consistent with, but supportive of, the controlled demolition hypothesis.
    –
    Certainty of impending collapse
    To worry that a damaged building might collapse in some fashion is one thing. But to be certain that it will collapse is another. A detailed study of the FDNY accounts by 9/11 researcher Graeme MacQueen shows that more than half of those who received warnings of WTC 7’s collapse (where a degree of certainty can be determined from the reports) were certain or were told with certainty that Building 7 was coming down. (The figures calculate to 31 out of 58. See MacQueen’s report “Waiting for Seven…” at page 4.)
    –
    Early FDNY announcements of collapse
    If someone were observing the fires in WTC 7 and able to determine, in the last few moments of the building’s existence, that a peculiar set of circumstances was beginning to threaten the building, that would be one thing. But to receive warnings of the building’s collapse well before this set of circumstances arose raises suspicion. Yet, a detailed study of the FDNY reports shows that of the thirty-three cases where the time of warning can be determined, in ten cases warnings were received two or more hours in advance, and in six cases warnings were apparently received four or more hours in advance. (See MacQueen’s “Waiting for Seven…” at page 4.) In other words, the warnings came long before the unique set of circumstances had allegedly come together to cause the building’s collapse.
    –
    Precise warnings of collapse
    If the collapse warnings were derived from vague worries and concerns, as claimed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the warnings would not have been precise. A complete collapse, such as happened to WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7 on 9/11, was unknown – unless the building was being brought down by controlled demolition. That is why FDNY member James McGlynn could say on 9/11, in reference to one of the Towers, “Any time I’ve heard of a collapse, it was never an entire building like this turned out to be.” (See MacQueen’s “Waiting for Seven‚” at page 21.) Nevertheless, somehow, many people knew in advance that WTC 7 would suffer an unprecedented collapse. Which begs the question, “How did they know?” Consider the following exchange from the FDNY oral histories:
    –

    • Q. “Were you there when building 7 came down in the afternoon?”
    • A: “Yes”
    • Q. “You were still there?”
    • A. “Yes, so basically they measured out how far the building was going to come, so we knew exactly where we could stand.”
    • Q. “So they just put you in a safe area, safe enough for when that building came down?“
    • A. “Five blocks. Five blocks away. We still could see. Exactly right on point, the cloud stopped right there.”(See MacQueen’s “Waiting for Seven…” at page 8.)
      –
      read more!

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEuJimaumW4]
end

Post navigation

Previous Post:

Why Israeli Settlements Are The Real Threat to Peace!

Next Post:

9/11 Revisited (KL, Malaysia): How to Prosecute the 9/11 War Crimes!

Pages

  • About

Recent Posts

  • FedRes Liabilities and Capital: Liabilities: Reverse Repurchase Agreements: Wednesday Level — New Record $2.5 Trillion!!
  • UK Economic Collapse Is Under Way. Part 2.
  • END Of The Dollar! – Fed Announces GREAT RESET Plan! – Digital World Currency Imminent!
  • Coxvid Vwac-xines More Likely to Put You in Hospital, British Medical Journal Reports
  • FULL SHOW: Will The Monkeypox Global Health Emergency Usher In The WHO’s One World Government Medical Police State?
  • BREAKING: UN Set To Announce Monkeypox Global Emergency/New Lockdowns??
  • Germany Elevates Risk Level In Its “National Gas Emergency Plan” To Second-Highest “Alarm” Phase
  • NATO Engaged in Direct Aggression Against Russia
  • What They Just Said About Economic COLLAPSE Should Scare Us All | Redacted with Clayton Morris
  • Biden Leading US to ‘World War’ – Trump
  • Moscow And NATO Could Be About to Clash Over Russia’s European Exclave Kaliningrad
  • Russia Says Response Over Kaliningrad Sanctions ‘Will Not Be Diplomatic’
  • Israel Provokes Russia
  • Risk Benefit of the Vwac-xines is NEGATIVE According to a New Paper from Stanford, UCLA, Others. Whoops!
  • Germany Triggers ‘Alert Level’ of Emergency Gas Plan, Sees High Risk of Long-Term Supply Shortages
  • IEA: Europe Should Prepare For Complete Russian Gas Shutdown
  • ITS OVER! The Fed. IS STILL BUYING IT ALL! More Propaganda, Lies, And Misinformation. Mannarino
  • Situation Update, June 23, 2022: Demolition of Supply Chains is Pre-Civil War SABOTAGE
  • 8 Huge Events The Mainstream Just Ignored | Andy Schectman
  • Martin Armstrong: The Collapse of the Republic

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011

Categories

  • Disaster
  • Economics
  • Endtimes
  • Geo-Politics
  • History
  • Medicine & Health
  • Satire
  • Science & Technology
  • Social Trends
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
December 2012
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
© 2022 Socio-Economics History Blog | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes