Escobar: Patriot Missiles, Chemical Weapons Hype (Propaganda) Aim to Intimidate Syria!

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AixGqpLwKQ]

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejph4LBdmmc]

• US Repeats Syrian Chemical Weapons “Warnings”! 
  by Tony Cartalucci, http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/ 
  December 4, 2012 (LD) – Once again, the US has issued a warning against Syria deploying “chemical weapons” citing “intelligence reports that the Damascus government is preparing such munitions for possible use.” No evidence was provided, nor any reasonable explanation as to why the Syrian government would deploy such weapons when, after over 2 years, the majority of the Syrian people still stand behind the government while terrorist forces flooding over Syria’s borders have been faced with constant tactical and strategic defeat.
  –
  Despite attempts to portray Damascus and Aleppo as on the inevitable edge of  collapse, now for a full 6 months, both cities are still firmly in the hands of  government troops, with only symbolic terror attacks murdering scores of  civilians at a time and temporary advances made on isolated bases before  promptly being abandoned by NATO-backed terrorists – a pattern not unlike that facing Western forces in NATO-occupied Afghanistan.
  –
  The accusations were printed in the Washington Post article, “Obama warns Syria amid rising concern over chemical weapons,” but despite the insinuations, includes the disclaimer (emphasis added), “Syria is thought to have several hundred surface-to-surface ballistic missiles capable of carrying chemical warheads.”
  –
  Other nations “thought to have” weapons of mass destruction included Iraq, which in hindsight, after a 10 year war and occupation, following years of crippling sanctions leaving millions dead, turned out not to in fact have such weapons.
  –
  It is unlikely that the Syrian government would use such weapons, thus giving the West the excuse it would need to directly intervene militarily, a scenario the West has been attempting to sell for the last 2 years, and particularly so following NATO’s military operations in Libya throughout 2011.
  –
  Conversely, NATO’s proxy forces operating in Syria possess both the means and motivation to carry out chemical attacks, therefore blaming Syria’s government and granting the West the impetus needed to intervene more directly. 
  –
  NATO-backed Terrorists have the Means.
  Libya’s arsenal had fallen into the hands of sectarian extremists with NATO assistance last year in the culmination of efforts to overthrow the North African nation . Since then, Libya’s militants led by commanders of Al Qaeda’s Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) have armed sectarian extremists across the Arab World, from as far West as Mali, to as far East as Syria.
  –
  read more!

end