Will Israel Attack Iran This Year?

• My assessment is that Zionist ‘666’ Israel will definitely attack Iran this year. The coming attack has nothing to do with Iran being a nuclear threat. It is a LIE, a false pretext to deceive the Israeli sheeple. It has to do with the petrodollar global currency hegemony, the USD! Iran is selling oil in currencies other than the USD. Rumours are swirling that Saudi Arabia may soon abandon the petrodollar too. Because of the petrodollar standard, the USD is in demand and thus can function as the world reserve currency.
  –
• It is this global monetary hegemony which gives the western Illuminati its power over the world. With it they create gobs of money out of thin air to finance their wars. With it they manipulate prices of commodities, stocks … attack sovereign nations … cause famine, destroy nations financially … etc. There is no way the western Illuminati will give up this power. They would rather go to thermonuclear world than lose their grip on the world.
  –
• Thus, I believe that they will not allow Iran to continue defying their global hegemony for long. They know China(with the support of the BRICS) is building up an alternative gold backed currency for trade settlement. Ie.: potentially a new world reserve currency and thus the end of the western global financial and monetary hegemony. Emphasis mine:
  –
  Will Israel Attack Iran This Year? 
  by Michael S. Rozeff, http://www.lewrockwell.com/ 
  … Politicians often play these dangerous games of threats, military buildups, alliances, ship and troop movements, subterfuges, false flag events, and leaked “information”. They act like little boys who haven’t grown up, except that they have weapons and military forces at their disposal to assist in their irresponsible antics. And, unfortunately for us, what they do has far-reaching effects on the lives of many of us.
  –
  Netanyahu is meeting with serious political resistance within Israel to his threats against Iran. Even before the Aug. 20 news report, he had been accused by Israel’s Kadima party leader of “creating a panic” for war against Iran. His response via the leak has been to brush off such criticism by a display of his firmness toward his goal of attacking Iran. He may not be the actual source of the leak; it may have come through his Defense Minister Ehud Barak. This is of no great moment.
  –
  On Friday, August 23, Netanyahu kept up his effort to diminish his opposition’s standing by being quoted by his spokesman of saying “Only yesterday we received additional proof that Iran is continuing accelerated progress towards achieving nuclear weapons and is totally ignoring international demands.” This statement cannot be taken as meaning much of anything, given its source. I think that Netanyahu is referring simply to the fact that Iran and the IAEA on the same day reportedly failed to reach an agreement. They have been having discussions for some time.
  –
  Netanyahu is trying to smoke Obama out by eliciting pressure from pro-Israel voters in America, but Obama is playing it cool on Netanyahu’s overheated rhetoric. What else can Obama do? He has never embraced Netanyahu’s position. He has always stood for the sanctions route. If he approved of Netanyahu’s stance now, it would be a green light for an aggression on Iran and a brand new war. Obama’s not about to do that with an election coming up. If he spoke up against Netanyahu, he’d lose some pro-Israel votes. So he says little. Instead he plays off the remarks of Netanyahu as all smoke and no fire. An unconfirmed report has an unidentified administration official saying “the Israelis feel the need to elevate the urgency on the Iranian timeline. They tend to do this from time to time. It’s something we’ve learned to live with.”
  –
  The Iranians naturally elevate their counter-threats so as to deter an Israeli attack, which would have to be a nuclear attack in order to achieve its goal. What is that goal? It is here that we enter the theatre of the absurd. Such an attack might delay Iran’s legal program of uranium enrichment for only a few years and it might encourage Iran to develop nuclear weaponry. Furthermore, with Israel being the clear aggressor, Iran would occupy the moral high ground. It would be able to counterattack Israel by any and all means of its choosing whenever and wherever it wanted to. It would be able to attack Israel for an open-ended and unlimited period of time. Even if its forces currently are weak and unable to prosecute a conventional war, it would be able over time to mobilize its resources against Israel. Its population would likely rally behind that effort. An Israeli attack might mobilize the more radical elements in Iran and encourage a government that is even less to the liking of Israel than the current one.
  –
  Is it worth it to Israelis to be under threat of attack and actual attacks of all sorts and to increase the nuclear threat against their country in return for stopping for a few years what it is legal for Iran to do? Is it worth it for Israel to join the exclusive club of nations that have attacked others with nuclear weapons, consisting at present only of the U.S.? Is it worth it for Israel to provide the very grounds that would make it a pariah among nations and encourage fundamental alterations in the nature of the Jewish state? Is it worth it to the U.S. government to enter a new war and a nuclear war at that when Iran poses no significant threat to U.S. interests? Is it worth it to the U.S. to send the price of oil soaring and to devastate its own and the world’s economy?
  –
  Netanyahu’s goal makes no sense. What he expects to gain by attacking Iran in no way compensates for the prospective consequences. I have to wonder if he is able to think straight about the consequences of attacking Iran. On May 31, 2012, it was reported that “the majority of Israel’s defense chiefs are against a military strike in Iran at this time”. They surely recognize what the results will be.
  …
  If Netanyahu attacked Iran, the world situation would change drastically. All the major powers would become involved, in addition to the changes mentioned above. If Obama died and Biden became president, the whole world would change.
  ….
  There is still ample scope for a man like Benjamin Netanyahu or George Bush or Barack Obama to start a war that has far-reaching effects. It is only because of this far-reaching power that we are asking such a question as “Will Israel attack Iran this year?”.

end