Zionist Israel || Gaza: And Now for Plan B. (There Never Was a Plan A) — The Forced Displacement of Palestinians [REAL Jews] into the North Sinai Desert ! The Imminent Fulfilment of Revelation 12:6,13-14
by mosesman
The Zionist plan is to expel Palestinians (REAL Jews) into the North Sinai desert via war. Thus, fulfilling Revelation 12:6,13-14.
Gaza: And Now for Plan B. (There Never Was a Plan A) by Stephen Games, https://www.timesofisrael.com/, 29 August 2025 I am finally coming round to a view about how to resolve the Israel-Palestine problem that I’ve enthused about and backed away from repeatedly for a while. Before revealing its details, though, I feel I should note various caveats. – First, it’s a loose view. If I could find a better one, I’d happily jump from one to the other. I don’t have any reason to promote this one if another makes more sense. – Second, I allow myself this view as an indulgence. I’m just a bystander: I wield no influence, and it matters little what I think. No one with any political power is desperate to know my opinion or is going to be swayed by what I say. – Third, it’s clear to me—from having tested the idea on friends—that what I’m proposing is off the scale when it comes to mainstream ideas. Not only do I not expect to get applauded for it, I expect to get opposed and even condemned by anyone who bothers to take note. – Fourth, I’m aware that the view I’ve gravitated to is partly the product of my being Jewish, and that others will identify it as being attractive to me only because I am Jewish, and not because it has any objective merit. In fact, probably the opposite: that it is utterly unrealistic and I am only drawn to the madness of it because I am Jewish and therefore blind. …. And so to Plan B What is that better solution? It is (a) to give Israel undisputed ownership of Gaza and the West Bank, making it a whole country rather than one that is pitted on both sides by dents and gaps; and (b) to create a purpose-built Palestinian state that will unify and benefit the whole of the Palestinian population and enable them to realise their aspirations as a people—albeit such aspirations have only existed since and because of the formation of Israel as a modern state. – This new country would take as its site the whole of the Sinai Peninsula, with the exception of a border corridor on the east side of the Suez Canal, which would remain under the control of Egypt. – Sinai is a spectacular opportunity. It has a 220-km coastline on the Mediterranean looking north, and a 500-km coastline on the Gulf of Suez and the Gulf of Aqaba looking south. It is wholly undeveloped and offers conditions for growth and prosperity that neither Gaza nor the West Bank come anywhere near to. – It is, in addition, a single landmass where the Palestinians’ current divisions—geographical, political and cultural—could at last be healed. The very prospect makes a mockery of the current hankering for a state that would operate from two non-contiguous territories either side of Israel proper—or three territories, if the Israeli authorities allow the E1 development project that will expand Jerusalem east to Maale Adumim. – In addition, Sinai is large: at about 60,000 square km, it’s three times the size of Israel, which has a landmass of only 20,000 square km. That would put a new Palestinian state on a par with Croatia, Czechia, Latvia and Lithuania—all very respectable small-to-medium European countries. By any standard, that’s a very good deal; Israel, the size of Wales, Slovenia, Sardinia and—in the USA—New Jersey, is a pigmy by comparison. – What it would require is Egypt’s willingness to sell the land off. That is something Egypt might be tempted to do, given its historic lack of interest in Sinai and the fact that the peninsula represents only 6 percent of its total area. There would also undoubtedly be an appealing flow of funds—from the USA, the Arab League and other countries, either in the form of gifts and aid, or loans raised against the future economic prosperity of the new polity. – Sinai for the Palestinians promises everything that’s not available now, and still wouldn’t be available if Palestine had to straddle the land between the river and the sea. It offers the prospect of full employment, and a belief in the future rather than continued entrapment by the past, something that benighted Palestinian youth urgently needs—if nothing else to relieve it of its obsession with hatred and revenge—and to bring it at last into the warm embrace of secular neoliberalism and its more redeeming values. – That, by contrast, would be something the whole world might wish to take part in instead of continuing to act collectively in a way that traps the Palestinians in a dependency culture that degrades and demoralises them. – read more.
Click on image for article.https://www.aa.com.tr/en/analysis/analysis-deal-of-century-and-the-plan-to-relocate-palestinians/1716084#Click on image for article.
Click on image for article.Click on image for article.Click on image for article.Click on image for article.Click on image for article.Click on image for article.
