NATO Breaks Treaty to Establish Permanent Forces in the Baltics
- “The pretext for the attack plan is to defend the new Baltic members of NATO, which happen to surround Russia, namely Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia.”
– Quote from: WikiLeaks Reveals NATO’s WW3 Attack Plan Against Russia
– - NATO Breaks Treaty to Establish Permanent Forces in the Baltics
by http://sputniknews.com/
NATO is set to break a 1997 treaty it signed with Russia by establishing permanent forces in Latvia, as it piles in more troops to the Baltic States.
–
Latvia’s Cabinet of Ministers has approved a request to ensure a permanent NATO military presence in the country following a review of Latvia’s NATO membership. Latvian Prime Minister, Laimota Straujuma, told the Baltic Times that government ministers were evaluating how plans proposed during the NATO Wales Summit in September 2014 to reverse the decline in military spending were progressing.
–
He said generals from Lithuania and Estonia will also request NATO deploys several thousand ground troops in their countries. Lithuanian military spokesman Captain Mindaugas Neimontas said:
–
“We are seeking a brigade-size unit so that every Baltic nation would have a battalion.”
–
NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander of Europe, Philip Breedlove, said the three countries were to seek “permanent rotational NATO forces” as a “deterrence measure due to the security situation in the region.”
–
However, the deployment of permanent forces flies in the face of the Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between NATO and the Russian Federation which was signed in Paris, France on 27 May 1997.
–
It declared that “NATO and Russia do not consider each other as adversaries” and that the two parties will work together to prevent any potentially threatening build-up of conventional forces in agreed regions of Europe, to include Central and Eastern Europe.
–
The Act states that NATO “will carry out its collective defense and other missions by ensuring the necessary interoperability, integration, and capability for reinforcement rather than by additional permanent stationing of substantial combat forces.”
–
read more.
end
Reblogged this on Jewish and Christian News.