Terrorist Attacks in Beirut: Western Media frames Civilian Areas as “Hezbollah Strongholds”!

• Terrorist Attacks in Beirut: Western Media frames Civilian Areas as “Hezbollah Strongholds”! 
  by Sharmine Narwani, http://www.globalresearch.ca/
  Beirut was thrown into turmoil on Thursday evening as a terrorist attack against residents of Dahiyeh – a southern suburb of the Lebanese capital and a predominantly Shia neighborhood – threatened to draw the country into a region wide crisis.
  –
  As conflicting news reports began to eke out in the immediate aftermath of the city’s deadliest car bombing in eight years, there was a disconcerting congruity in headlines beaming out from western capitals – and it had nothing to do with facts. In lock-step, western media was calling the scene of the crime a “Hezbollah stronghold”:
  –
  Wall Street Journal: “Car Bomb Blasts Hezbollah Stronghold in Lebanon” BBC: “Deadly Lebanon Blast in Beirut Stronghold of Hezbollah” LA Times: “Massive Explosion in Beirut Rocks Hezbollah Stronghold” Washington Post: “Bomb Explodes in Hezbollah Stronghold in Beirut, Injuring Dozens” Reuters: “Over 50 Hurt as Car Bomb Hits Hezbollah Beirut Stronghold” Associated Press: “Car Bomb Rocks Hezbollah Stronghold in Lebanon” France24: “Car Bomb Rocks Hezbollah Stronghold in Beirut”
  –
  A quick Twitter or Google search for “Hezbollah stronghold” is all you need to see how hard western media works to “frame” language and drive use of a phrase that makes Shia civilian life negligible.
  –
  On Twitter Thursday night, “tweeps” questioned the validity of this phrase in describing a civilian neighborhood. Said one observer: “When you write “Hezbollah stronghold” instead of South Beirut it gives the impression military barracks were bombed and no innocents died.
  –
  That view seemed to be confirmed by the reaction of an American tweep who wrote: “GREAT NEWS!!!!!” in response to the BBC headline “Deadly Lebanon blast in Beirut stronghold of Hezbollah.”
  –
  Worse yet was this reprehensible tweet by Al Monitor’s Washington correspondent and senior fellow at the Atalantic Council Barbara Slavin, who declared on Twitter: “As I recall, Hezbollah invented the car bomb; what goes around, comes around.” Except, of course, the targets of Thursday’s terror attack – where 27 died and nearly 300 injured – were civilians, not Hezbollah.
  –
  An army of tweeps quickly reminded Slavin that Hezbollah neither invented the car bomb nor targets civilians, and drew attention to the ironic fact that Israeli militant groups used them liberally in attacking British officials in Palestine last century – well before Hezbollah’s 1985 formation to combat Israel’s occupation of Lebanon.
  –
  And herein lies the problem. By calling a residential neighborhood a “Hezbollah stronghold,” western media softens public opinion to accept these terror attacks as justifiable, and their targets, legitimate. Because the only reason for characterizing civilian Shia neighborhoods as “strongholds” of Hezbollah is to justify carnage against those populations most likely to support the Lebanese resistance group.
  –
  Similar language – War on Terror, terrorism, militants, extremists, Al Qaeda – is also frequently employed to excuse western carnage in countries from Iraq to Afghanistan to Mali to Yemen to Pakistan. Droning and bombing targets are rarely characterized as “civilian,” even though data suggests that most victims of US attacks are not militants. The goal? To eradicate second thoughts about violence against innocent civilians – often bolstered by a complicit media that characterizes these deaths as “collateral damage.”
  –
  read more!

end