UK Drug Safety Agency Falsified Vaccine Safety Data For 6 Million – Millions of Children At Serious Risk?!
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7LH9TRCHuA]
- UK Drug Safety Agency Falsified Vaccine Safety Data For 6 Million – Millions of Children At Serious Risk?!
by http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/
[See also “HPV Vaccine Destroys Australian Child’s Ovaries – Manufacturer Didn’t Check“]
–
This world exclusive report by CHS follows the decision by health authorities in Japan to withdraw their recommendation for human papilloma virus [HPV] vaccines because of high levels of serious adverse reactions in Japanese women and girls. Japanese girls will still be able to be vaccinated at no charge, but from now on they will be informed by healthcare providers that the health ministry does not recommend the vaccines.
–
Cervarix and Gardasil HPV vaccines were found to cause substantially higher rates of adverse reactions than other vaccines: Cervix vaccine issues trigger health notice Japan Times Jun 15, 2013 National Kyodo.
–
One report claims the rate of serious adverse reactions which Japanese women experienced after Cervarix injections are 52 times the rate of those reported after annual influenza vaccines: Urgent Request from Japan: Help Stop HPV Vaccinations July 27, 2013 By Norma Erickson SaneVax, Inc.
–
The UK media fail to report this kind of news affecting millions of British school children and families despite affecting their own families and networks of relatives in the UK. Journalism is a dying profession. So don’t buy newspapers or believe TV news reports. The UK’s BBC has become the British Government’s press office.
–
British Parents Not Told Their Children Are Not At Risk of Cervical Cancer
The targeted vaccination group of 12-year-old British schoolgirls are at no risk of contracting cervical cancer. Cervical cancer is an extremely rare disease. The risk is normally zero up to age 20. The risk of serious adverse reactions from the vaccine is therefore infinitely higher. In the UK the disease is so rare there are just 3 deaths in every 100,000 women of all ages as figures from Cancer Research UK show. What is worse is that by the time there is any risk for these schoolgirls any effect from the vaccine [if there ever was one] would have worn off yet these young women may then think they are protected and fail to undergo routine screening when they will still need it regardless of the vaccine.
–
By the time there is any risk of mortality for these 12 year-old schoolgirls it is extremely low. The risk of death from cervical cancer in the age range 20-24 is 3 in every million women of that age range. The disease does not normally affect schoolgirls. The highest number of deaths occur in women in their late seventies.
–
How UK Health Officials Tampered With the Adverse Reaction Reporting Systems
In the UK the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency [MHRA] first interference was to encourage health professional not to report adverse reactions. This was done in formal advice issued in the name of Chief Executive Professor Sir Kent Woods telling health professionals that reactions can be “psychogenic” – or in simpler terms a figment of 12 year old schoolgirls’ imaginations and nothing to do with the vaccines [see more below for full details].
–
Next the data from over 6000 reports of suspected adverse reactions was systematically altered resulting in the MHRA declaring the vaccine safe when it was not.
–
The third thing the MHRA staff did was to fix the final figures to make the rate of adverse reactions appear lower by substituting the number of doses given for the number of children receiving the vaccine. Tampering with statistics by basing rates of adverse reactions on doses given reduced the numbers of adverse reactions per child by three times. This is because each child was to receive three doses of the vaccine. So whilst 6 million doses may have been given that represented only around one third of that figure in children receiving the vaccine – resulting in the rates of adverse reactions reported being calculated as 300% lower than they were per child.
–
In other words if all children received all three doses then the crucial figure was not the number of doses but the number of children who suffered reactions compared to the total number of children.
–
The MHRA was headed at the time by Chairman Professor Alasdair Breckenridge [retired December 2012] and Professor Sir Kent Woods [MHRA Chief Executive but shortly expected to retire after 10 years service].
–
Questions For Heads Of UK Drug Regulatory Agency – MHRA
The first question for Professors Breckenridge and Woods is – if Japanese women suffered adverse reactions at a rate 52 times higher for GSK’s Cervarix vaccine than for flu vaccine how can possible adverse reactions just be figments of childrens’ imagination and so are not to be reported by medical professionals? [“psychogenic” was how Woods put it more formally – see his official advice to medical professionals – more below].
–
Clearly, that cannot be the case. Not only that but Woods and Breckenridge cannot claim to be ignorant of those facts. They must know that is the position. Nearly half of all reports included what the MHRA categorised as “psychogenic” symptoms which the MHRA say are “all in the mind” and could not therefore be caused by the vaccine. A full list in a spreadsheet to enable further sorting and analysis can be downloaded here: 130728 Single list of all Cervarix Yellow Card Reports or browsed at the end of this article.
–
You can also download the MHRA’s own published .pdf analyses listing the symptoms reported broken up into these five groups. These are the reports used to declare the vaccine safe:
–Here are just a few examples of MHRA’s alleged “all in the mind” “psychogenic” reactions by “hysterical schoolgirls”:
–
read more!
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCA5haGU6sI]
end
One comment
Comments are closed.